Legal Perspective To Capital Reconstruction Of Banks
It is generally accepted that banks are inevitable component of an economic system and that the capital of a bank is the foundation on which it stands. This foundation has continued to witness dynamic changes leading to crisis that often threaten to rock the foundation of our banking system. At each of the point the crisis the depositors had always turned to the state and the central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for help.
Unfortunately the two have no coordinated resolution scheme that would punish those responsible for depositors and other creditor’s woes and at the same time save money for the state or taxpayer from the cost of resolution of the crisis. It has therefore become necessary to examine the legal perceptive to rehabilitation of this basic aspect of our banks and the banking system particularly the challenges faced by the institutions responsible for bank’s capital reconstruction during and after crisis The major player in resolution of banking crisis –the CBN has just two major tools for crisis management namely the power of liquidation and the power of lender of last resort.
The exercise of power of liquidation has a direct negative impact on the depositors’ confidence especially where depositors have lost money to a failing or failed bank. The power of lender of last resort guarantees that no depositors lose money to failing or failed bank but it leaves a lot of legal and moral issues unresolved. The first issue is that the cost of repaying the depositor fund is borne by the tax payers’ money instead of the bank management that are often responsible for mismanagement of the bank’s capital that lead to the crisis. Secondly the criminal legal system often does not punish the perpetrators of fraud and mismanagement leading to either liquidation or spending of tax payers’ money. The result is that instead of strengthening the corporate governance culture in the banks in the system, the lender of last resort tends to encourage carelessness frauds and mismanagement in the banking system.
This therefore calls for extension of the roles of the regulatory institutions in the system from mere intervention to active participation in fashioning and implementing lasting capital reconstruction measures in the banks. The research proceeded on the assumption that banking crisis will continue to happen, there will continue to be need for resolution scheme that will reconstruct the bank’s capital and beef up liquidity else panic will ensue in the system which may lead to total collapse of the banking system. Therefore there is the need to harmonize the legal procedures and institutions necessary for capital reconstruction in the country.
The Title Page should be the first section of your project “Legal Perspective To Capital Reconstruction Of Banks”, providing essential details like the project title, your name, your supervisor’s name, the institution, and the submission date. After that, the Abstract offers a brief summary of your project, touching on its purpose, methods, results, and conclusions in 150-300 words. The Acknowledgments section is where you can thank those who supported your research, such as your supervisor, peers, or organizations that provided resources.
Next, the Table of Contents organizes the Legal Perspective To Capital Reconstruction Of Banks by listing its chapters and sections, along with page numbers for easy reference. The List of Figures and List of Tables help guide readers to specific visual elements like graphs, charts, or tables included in the document. There should also be an Abbreviations and Glossary section to explain any specialized terms or acronyms, making the content clearer to readers unfamiliar with the technical language.
The main body of the Legal Perspective To Capital Reconstruction Of Banks should start with the Introduction, which provides background information, outlines the research problem, states your objectives, and gives a brief overview of your research methods. Following that, the Literature Review offers an in-depth look at previous research relevant to your project, identifying gaps your study aims to address. The Methodology section then explains the research design, tools, and data collection methods you used to conduct the project and analyze the data.
In the Results and Discussion section, you present your findings and discuss them in relation to the Legal Perspective To Capital Reconstruction Of Banks research questions or objectives, often using tables or charts to help explain the data. The Conclusion summarizes the key results, discusses their implications, and suggests possible directions for future research. You may also include recommendations based on your findings, offering practical advice for improvements or applications. Finally, the Legal Perspective To Capital Reconstruction Of Banks project should include a References or Bibliography section to list all the sources you cited, as well as Appendices for any additional material. A Statement of Originality is often included to confirm the authenticity of your work